Air Quality - should we have achieved more?

Volume:

22.2

Publication date:

April 2013

Editors:

David Muir; Emma Fenton; Caroline Beattie

This journal summarises the state of the air quality profession and asks the question "should we have achieved more". Broadly speaking, the articles have three themes: a retrospective showing how we have reached the current situation, a review of topical issues and an attempt to look to the future. The journal concludes with some opinions on why the general public are not more vocal about air quality issues.

Modern life; choices or no choice - David Muir
The evolution of air quality policies over the past 20 years - Martin Williams
Air quality law: the EU context - Alan Andrews
Air quality legislation and practice - a practitioner's perspective - David Muir
Clean Air in London - Simon Birkett
Air pollution and health: past, present and future - Robert Maynard
Air quality and the water environment - Mark Everard
The threats from construction dust and fungal spores - Claire Holman
Partial recovery of shallow acid-sensitive lakes from acidification - Herman van Dam, Adrienne Mertens
Are we losing our sense of values? - Maria Arnold
Transforming air quality: reflections on the past, present and future - Roger Barrowcliffe
Inconsistency undermines progress for air quality - Samantha Arnold
Where is the public outcry against poor air quality in the UK - Various

Download:
Air Quality - should we have achieved more?

<< Full journal archive

Our open access commitment
We are firm supporters of open access as we believe we have a moral responsibility to make environmental science widely available to affect change. If you appreciate the availability of this information and have found it useful, please consider making a donation.

Who to contact

Bea Gilbert

Publications Lead

Latest journal

Counting on Net Gain

This issue of the journal examines an idea that is gaining traction in environmental thinking in recent years: net gain.

...